3rd Ave - What does it indicate when tide tables say unsafe?
-
- Joey
- Posts:2
- Joined:Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:14 am
- Contact:
I notice on the tide tables linked from the 3rd ave cam (http://www.poulton.net/windsurf/wrpt.html#tides), that when the tide gets below 2.5' it says "unsafe".
On what basis is it deemed to be unsafe? Exposed rocks? Water moving too fast from tide swings?
Thanks.
On what basis is it deemed to be unsafe? Exposed rocks? Water moving too fast from tide swings?
Thanks.
- windhorny
- Old School
- Posts:4039
- Joined:Mon Jul 11, 2005 12:47 pm
- Location:Alameda
- Contact:
- gnukid
- Valued Contributor
- Posts:165
- Joined:Tue Aug 02, 2005 3:36 pm
- Contact:
Unsafe low tide means that there is tons of mud at the launch sites and therefore you will not be able to sail in through the mud and will have to walk, sinking deep into mud, unless you can do a butter slide for 50 meters. You could get stuck, you could step on sharp objects and shells in the mud. You could receive transmission of toxins from the mud to your body depending on the beach, Alameda is considered most toxic.
But truly you should be fine if you are careful to time your session and come in before you see that access is becoming severely limited.
But truly you should be fine if you are careful to time your session and come in before you see that access is becoming severely limited.
- windhorny
- Old School
- Posts:4039
- Joined:Mon Jul 11, 2005 12:47 pm
- Location:Alameda
- Contact:
- glenn
- Valued Contributor
- Posts:230
- Joined:Thu May 18, 2006 7:58 pm
- Location:Berkeley
- Contact:
-
- Old School
- Posts:1072
- Joined:Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:59 pm
- Location:Santa Cruz, CA: Alameda, CA: BayPoint
- Contact:
Is it because a channel is dredged annually for boat traffic, thus upsetting the sediment?
Since sand is introduced every spring, would that help reduce the toxicity level as well?
Why doesn't Foster city or San Mateo do what the city of Alameda does, add sand to reclaim eroded soil?
Since sand is introduced every spring, would that help reduce the toxicity level as well?
Why doesn't Foster city or San Mateo do what the city of Alameda does, add sand to reclaim eroded soil?
gnukid said:
...
, Alameda is considered most toxic.
...
- pedro
- Contributor
- Posts:16
- Joined:Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:57 pm
- Contact:
Got mud? Check it out:windhorny wrote:try walking in that mud and you will never have felt so glad to be alive on solid ground.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYGUkybv5nI
Last edited by pedro on Fri Aug 29, 2008 11:56 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Regular
- Posts:632
- Joined:Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:33 am
- Contact:
WRONG...
"unsafe" refers to windsurfing. Means that the tide is too low to safely launch from the windsurfing launch and clear your fin. On a visual basis, an old rule of thumb, was to look downwind at the levee point just downwind of the first ramp past the lower kite launch. If the water was at the levee you could launch your windsurfer and "safely" clear your fin.
steve
"unsafe" refers to windsurfing. Means that the tide is too low to safely launch from the windsurfing launch and clear your fin. On a visual basis, an old rule of thumb, was to look downwind at the levee point just downwind of the first ramp past the lower kite launch. If the water was at the levee you could launch your windsurfer and "safely" clear your fin.
steve
- robotvox
- Valued Contributor
- Posts:157
- Joined:Sun Jul 20, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location:silicon
- Contact:
- Sonny
- Resident
- Posts:892
- Joined:Tue Apr 26, 2005 8:18 am
- Location:Foster City
- Contact:
Acutally, those are sponges. For some reason, we only have them in spring during low tides then they disappear.glenn wrote:In addition to the mud, there are barnacle covered rocks the size of bowling balls scattered like a mine field just a few inches below the surface of the muddy water (on a VERY low tide).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests